For years, value-based care has remained a central debate in the health care industry amid the ongoing push to improve outcomes while controlling costs. Traditional fee-for-service models have revealed their limitations, such as data fragmentation, misaligned incentives, regulatory complexity, technology gaps, and an overall cultural hesitancy to adopt to a new business practice. These challenges…
The shift towards value-based care in senior living is continuing in 2025, driven by rising resident acuity, tight margins and payer expectations. As acuity drives changes in how operators manage their communities, senior living providers are more closely tracking health outcomes to show the benefit of the services they provide to keep people from moving “downstream” in…
Value-based care (VBC) continues to become a mainstream reality for health care providers. While a patient may not notice a difference between a value-based or a fee-for-service (FFS) approach, there is a stark difference for physician practices. It represents a complete paradigm shift. VBC is a necessary approach that allows physicians to care for the…
Abstract This Perspective discusses the fiscal challenge facing Medicare and how that challenge may be differentially met by fee-for-service, accountable care organization (ACO), and Medicare Advantage (MA) payment systems. The non-MA part of Medicare includes both fee-for-service and ACO payment systems and is sometimes referred to as traditional Medicare. Fee-for-service, although in need of reform,…
The traditional fee-for-service (FFS) healthcare model isn’t well-suited to meet the complex needs of patients with chronic illnesses including chronic kidney disease (CKD). As costs spiral and population health declines, value-based care (VBC) presents a solution that can reshape how the healthcare system approaches CKD management and can serve as a model for how we…
Presidential transitions are always a time of great change, but few leaders have ushered in a shift as sweeping as the rewiring of one-seventh of the U.S. economy. President Trump has the opportunity to do just that by doubling down on the health transformation achievements of his first term. A key to success is continuing the…
Health inequities in the United States are persistent and pervasive, resulting from well-documented discrimination inside and outside the health system. These inequities are both preventable and treatable. Reforming how we pay for care is one of the many tools the health system has to improve equity. Yet reform efforts have fallen short and have only recently begun to…
In an effort to improve care quality and lower costs, the healthcare industry has been working on shifting from fee-for-service to value-based care delivery. The two models differ in the way providers are reimbursed for the care they provide by rewarding them service-by-service or based on overall quality and patient outcomes. In the following article, HealthPayerIntelligence breaks…
Equity was at the forefront of Reuters’ value-based health conference in Philadelphia last month. Over two days, executives from accountable care organizations, health systems and payers spoke about interoperability, population health, social determinants, the cost of care and taking on risk. Across the board, speakers agreed that the transition to value-based care (VBC) is both…
Value-based payment programs tie healthcare reimbursement rates to quality care by offering providers incentive payments to meet specified quality measures during and after healthcare delivery. As the industry moves away from fee-for-service models and toward value-based care models, CMS has implemented several programs to improve patient care, advance population health, and lower healthcare costs. These value-based…