Main Library

Use Value-Based Payment To Resolve The Debate About Telehealth Payment Parity

August 2, 2021Anna Morenz, Joshua M. LiaoNo CommentsHealth AffairsTelehealth

COVID-19 necessitated widespread loosening of state and federal restrictions on and rapid expansion of telehealth. Now, as policy makers consider telehealth in the post-pandemic period, they must make decisions about payment parity—whether to continue reimbursing clinicians equivalent amounts for in-person and telehealth visits.

Some argue that telehealth requires less clinical effort and fewer overhead costs than in-person care, undercutting the case for payment parity. Other concerns include telehealth’s lower effectiveness compared to in-person care, the potential for overuse and fraud, and increased health care spending. Those who support payment parity believe it would help clinicians adopt and maintain telehealth as a way to support health care access and patient experience. Arguments on both sides would be strengthened by more high-quality studies.

Because many tensions about payment parity are rooted in volume-based reimbursement, another way to help resolve the debate is to test telehealth within dedicated value-based payment models.

For instance, one concern about continued telehealth payment parity is that it could spur use that adds to, rather than substitutes for, in-person care, thereby increasing use and spending without clear clinical benefits. These risks may be enough for some payers to shift away from parity for certain telehealth modalities. Medicare has proposed that it will limit audio-only telehealth to mental health services in specific situations after the public health emergency.

Full Article

: COVID-19, payment parity, Telehealth, telehealth payment, telehealth payment parity, Telemedicine, value-based care, value-based payment, vbc

Related Posts

Social Determinants of Health: Technology, examples and healthcare trends in 2021

April 16, 2021Garrett Schmitt

CMS Expands Telehealth Coverage in Proposed 2022 Physician Fee Schedule

July 14, 2021Garrett Schmitt

62% of Consumers Unfamiliar with Value-Based Care, Study Finds

October 25, 2021Garrett Schmitt

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Medicare Advantage Advance Notice: Who Will be Impacted, and How?
  • Mastering Seasonal Scheduling to Achieve Higher Quality Outcomes
  • Food Security: Key Dimensions of the Social Determinant of Health
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: How to Prepare for Market Changes to Health Equity and Social Determinants of Health
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: How Innovative Digital Trends are Revolutionizing ACO Outcomes
 
  • Main Lobby
  • Exhibit Hall
  • Events
  • Exhibit With Us
  • Board Room
  • Library
  • Contact Us