Main Library
Key Issues Impacting Two-Sided Risk Accountable Care Organizations

Key Issues Impacting Two-Sided Risk Accountable Care Organizations

June 20, 2018Jacqueline LaPointeNo CommentsRevCycle IntelligenceRisk Management & Stratification

Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs) operating under two-sided financial risk arrangements save the federal healthcare program more than one-sided risk organizations. But policymakers must address financial incentives, benchmarks, and other issues to ensure two-sided risk ACOs continue to generate savings, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recently reported.

“Medicare ACOs were created to help moderate the growth in Medicare spending and improve quality of care for beneficiaries by giving providers greater responsibility for costs and quality. ACOs have grown rapidly (about a third of Medicare FFS [fee-for-service] beneficiaries are now in ACOs), and several new initiatives have been designed to expand ACOs,” MedPAC wrote to Congress in its June 2018 report.

Full Article

: APM, APMs, Downside Risk, MACRA, MedPAC, MSSP, Risk, Track 1+

Related Posts

New CHIME Report Indicates Slow Movement to Alternative Payment Models

November 14, 2019Garrett Schmitt

Accountable Care Organizations Want The Rewards But Few Want The Risk

June 13, 2018Garrett Schmitt

Six Ways Competition Must Shape Your APM Strategy

June 8, 2022aco

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Making Value-Based Payment The Best Choice For Providers
  • Value-based care’s blind spot: The missing link few are talking about
  • CMS proposes rule aligning Medicare physician payment with ‘Big Beautiful Bill,’ MACRA
  • How ASCs can reach their value-based care goals
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: Key Concepts in IDD Health Support for Care Managers
 
  • Main Lobby
  • Exhibit Hall
  • Events
  • Exhibit With Us
  • Board Room
  • Library
  • Contact Us