Main Library

How to Avoid an ACO Exodus — or Having No Takers in the First Place

January 24, 2022Peter WehrweinManaged Healthcare ExecutiveRisk Management

The question of whether ACOs should be forced to accept “downside risk” — in effect pay a penalty if they exceed certain spending benchmarks — has bedeviled CMS’ ACO programs and ACO programs in general. Seema Verma, the Trump administration’s CMS director, pushed for more downside risk, and the administration’s Pathway to Success program shortened the period during which ACOs in Medicare’s main ACOS could earn bonuses— “upside risk” — without also assuming the possibility of downside risk. Verma and others have argued that without downside risk, there isn’t enough of an incentive for ACOs to drive down spending while maintaining the quality of care=.

But researchers who report findings in this month’s issue of Health Affairs about a special program for smaller ACOs in rural areas argue that forcing downside risk after several years of participation is counterproductive, leading to the exit of ACOs and a missed chance for large savings for Medicare for the program.

Full Article

: ACO, ACOs, Downside Risk, Risk, risk management

Related Posts

How Fowler Plans to Refresh CMMI’s Value-Based Care Vision

April 20, 2021Garrett Schmitt

RECORDED WEBINAR: Harnessing Data in Value-based Care: How Atlantic Health Drives Success in Shared Savings Programs

October 5, 2022aco

Physician Advocates for Equity See Built-In Problems in ACO Incentives

August 16, 2022aco

Recent Posts

  • Three Lies And A Truth About ACO Data For APP Reporting
  • CMS Execs Describe ‘Universal Foundation’ to Align Quality Measures
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: Closing the Gaps: The REACH Model, Population Health, and the Diabetic Eye Exam
  • Building Relationships to Improve Access to Healthcare, Improve Health Equity
  • Considering Disability in Social Determinants of Health Referrals
 
  • Main Lobby
  • Exhibit Hall
  • Events
  • Exhibit With Us
  • Board Room
  • Library
  • Contact Us