Main Library
For value-based care, virtual options aren’t always beneficial, study shows

For value-based care, virtual options aren’t always beneficial, study shows

July 14, 2023Andrea FoxHealthcare IT NewsRemote Patient Monitoring,Telehealth and Virtual Care

Tackling value-based care is crucial with the upcoming 2030 mandate by CMS. But it can be challenging for providers to deliver equitable care while hitting value-based care goals.

A new telehealth study by the University of Texas McCombs School of Business found that virtual care did not significantly lower costs, or reduce the number of future visits to emergency rooms or specialists for circulatory, respiratory and infectious diseases.

WHY IT MATTERS

Indranil Bardhan, a professor of information, risk and operations management at UTexas, and his co-authors, Sezgin Ayabakan of Temple University and Zhiqiang ‘Eric’ Zheng of UTexas at Dallas, examined telehealth through the theory of process virtualization – replacing physical interactions with virtual ones.

Based on a study of patient visits across all hospital-based outpatient clinics in Maryland from 2012 to 2021, telehealth visits did reduce the overall number of future outpatient visits within 30 days of a telehealth encounter by 14% and saved $239 in total outpatient costs per patient, the new study found.

But for diseases of the heart or lung, for example, the virtual visits did not offer the same value.

“The effectiveness of telehealth is really a function of the type of disease that it is used to treat,” said Bardhan in Wednesday’s announcement about the study published in Information Systems Research.

By contrast, “patients with mental health, skin, metabolic and musculoskeletal diseases exhibit a significant reduction of 0.21 outpatient visits per quarter (an equivalent cost reduction of $179) when they are treated via telehealth, suggesting a substitution effect with respect to traditional clinic visits,” the authors said in the report abstract.

Bardhan said in the statement that the researchers hope their recommendations for developing telehealth programs enable more efficient use of resources “by encouraging healthcare professionals to focus telehealth on treating specific disease types and conditions where it can do the most good.”

Full Article

: COVID-19, FQHCs, Telemedicine, virtual care

Related Posts

Stakeholders Seek to Drive Near 100% of Medicare Reimbursements to Value-Based Contracts by 2025

November 23, 2021Garrett Schmitt

Working 9-to-3: Addressing the social determinants of aging

May 27, 2021Garrett Schmitt

To Sustain The Value Movement, Make Next Generation ACOs A Permanent Option

April 9, 2021Garrett Schmitt

Recent Posts

  • RECORDED WEBINAR: Beyond the Dashboard: Operationalizing Market Insights Across the Enterprise
  • A Strategic Guide for ACO Leaders: 3 Critical Considerations Before the August 1st CMS Deadline
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: Reducing Readmissions with Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliation for Safer Transitions of Care
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: CASE STUDY: How Privia Medical Group- North Texas and VillageMD Reduced Referral Leakage, Specialty, & Admin Costs
  • FLASH INTERVIEW – Symbion Coding Inc – 2025
 
  • Main Lobby
  • Exhibit Hall
  • Events
  • Exhibit With Us
  • Board Room
  • Library
  • Contact Us