Main Library

Supporting Value-Based Health Care — Aligning Financial and Legal Accountability

September 9, 2021Mark M. Zaki, M.D., M.B.A., Anupam B. Jena, M.D., Ph.D., and Amitabh Chandra, Ph.D.No CommentsThe New England Journal of MedicineACO Growth and Expansion,Legal Services,Financing/Working Capital

U.S. health care payment and delivery-system reforms have focused on improving care by making organizations accountable for outcomes, quality, and costs. Payers have supported the implementation of accountable care organizations (ACOs), bundled-payment models, and other value-based payment reforms because they believe that holding health care systems accountable for population-level costs and quality will be more effective than focusing accountability at the physician level. Evidence suggests that these models have increased value but have underperformed relative to the aspirations for them.

Several reasons have been proposed for the limited success of value-based reforms, including lack of clarity among physicians about how financial risks will be shared, inadequate risk adjustment for patients with complex conditions, and heterogeneous outcome measures. One factor that has often been overlooked is the misalignment between organizations’ incentives to spend wisely under value-based payment models and individual physicians’ incentives to reduce their malpractice liability risk. The salience of this risk for physicians means that policies that make organizations accountable for costs and quality are unlikely to be completely successful unless they address the role of liability in physicians’ decision making. For example, for risk-bearing organizations, cutting spending often begins with identifying low-value services and reducing their use. But evaluations of ACOs have revealed limited reductions in low-value care,1 a finding that is particularly surprising given that many low-value services, such as imaging and other diagnostic studies, are ordered by physicians who don’t have a financial stake in the service being performed, including primary care providers.

Full Article

: ACOs, financial accountability, legal accountability, value-based care, vbc

Related Posts

Prevention suffers when doctors drop out of Medicare’s ACO program

February 3, 2022aco

CMMI Chief Fowler: Value-Based Care at a Crossroads

April 20, 2021Garrett Schmitt

Downside Risk Pays Off: 4 Best Practices for High ACO Performance

October 19, 2021Garrett Schmitt

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Value-based care creating a new era of interoperability
  • ACO REACH And Advancing Equity Through Value-Based Payment, Part 1
  • Medicare Shared Savings Program: Celebrating 10 Years and Looking Forward to the Future
  • Considerations for Social Determinants of Health Screening Design
  • RECORDED WEBINAR: 5 Key Components for Organizational Growth Within Value-Based Care
 
  • Main Lobby
  • Exhibit Hall
  • Events
  • Exhibit With Us
  • Board Room
  • Library
  • Contact Us